• DEI in 5
  • Posts
  • Black Student’s Suspension Over Hairstyle Didn’t Violate Law, Texas Judge Rules, Google Pauses AI Image Generation of People after Diversity Backlash, Texas’ Ban on Diversity Ended Scholarships and More

Black Student’s Suspension Over Hairstyle Didn’t Violate Law, Texas Judge Rules, Google Pauses AI Image Generation of People after Diversity Backlash, Texas’ Ban on Diversity Ended Scholarships and More

DEI in 5: Biweekly DEI News

Read time: 7 minutes

Today’s Top 3 DEI News Bites👇🏾

The image shows a young man with short twisted hair and a stud earring in his ear. He is looking to the side and appears contemplative. He is wearing a dark hoodie, and the setting seems to be outdoors with natural lighting.

Credit: Michael Wyke/Associated Press

Summary: A Texas judge ruled that the suspension of a Black high school student, Darryl George, over his hairstyle, specifically his dreadlocks, did not violate the law. This decision comes after George's family filed a lawsuit, arguing that the school's dress code policy discriminated against him based on race and gender. The judge's ruling highlights the ongoing debate surrounding discrimination in school dress codes and their impact on students of color.

The Details:

  • School Suspension: Darryl George, a student at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, Texas, was suspended for refusing to cut his dreadlocks, citing his cultural identity and expression.

  • Lawsuit: The George family filed a lawsuit against the school district, claiming that the dress code policy unfairly targeted Black students and violated their civil rights.

  • The Ruling: The judge ruled in favor of the school district, stating that the policy was not discriminatory and that George's hairstyle violated the school's grooming standards.

  • Discrimination In Education: This case underscores the broader conversation about the intersection of dress codes, cultural identity, and discrimination in educational institutions.

Why is this relevant: This article sheds light on a contentious issue surrounding school dress codes and their potential to perpetuate discrimination, particularly against students of color. It highlights the legal battles and societal debates surrounding cultural expression, identity, and the rights of students within educational settings. It underscores the importance of addressing systemic biases within school policies to ensure equitable treatment and opportunities for all students.

The image shows a screenshot from what appears to be a digital interface, possibly a chat or an application, with a red background. In the screenshot, a text prompt says "Generate an image of a 1943 German Soldier." Below the text, there are four images displayed within the interface: The top left image shows a young man with fair skin, dressed in a World War II German uniform, including a helmet. The top right image portrays a woman with East Asian features in a similar uniform, also wearing a helmet. The bottom left image is a black-and-white depiction of a man with dark skin, wearing a German military uniform with a helmet and various badges. The bottom right image shows a scene with a woman in uniform attending to a wounded soldier in the field. Below the images, there is a button with the text "Generate more". The interface is indicative of an AI generation tool providing various interpretations of a German soldier from the year 1943.

© FT montage/Twitter

Summary: Google has decided to halt the development of new artificial intelligence (AI) tools for generating images of people following criticism over the lack of diversity in the images produced. Concerns have been raised about biases and underrepresentation, prompting Google to reassess its AI models and prioritize inclusivity in image generation.

The Details:

  • The Backlash of an AI Tool: Google has paused the development of AI tools for generating images of people due to backlash over the lack of diversity in the generated images.

  • Biases: The decision comes amid growing concerns about biases and underrepresentation in AI algorithms, particularly in image generation technologies.

  • Misrepresentation: Critics argue that the homogeneity of the AI-generated images perpetuates societal inequalities and fails to accurately reflect the diversity of human populations.

  • A Call for Reflection: Google's move reflects a broader recognition within the tech industry of the need to address biases and promote inclusivity in AI development and deployment.

Why is this relevant: The ethical and societal implications of AI technologies, particularly in terms of representation and diversity, are highlighted here. It underscores the responsibility of tech companies like Google to address biases and promote inclusivity in AI development to ensure fair and accurate outcomes. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in AI algorithms to mitigate potential harms and promote equitable access to technology for all individuals.

The image features a large, stately building with a central tower structure rising prominently against a blue sky dotted with fluffy white clouds. The architecture is classical, with columns and decorative details. In front of the building, there are well-manicured lawns and trees, adding to the grandeur of the scene. To the right, a Texas state flag flies proudly on a flagpole, indicating the location might be significant within the state of Texas.

Credit: Adobe Stock

Summary: Texas' prohibition on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts within public universities has had far-reaching consequences, including the termination of scholarships supporting marginalized students, a decline in the quality of Black History Month events, and diminished support for LGBTQ individuals. These changes stem from a budget provision aimed at curbing DEI initiatives, prompting criticism for hindering progress toward inclusivity and equality on college campuses.

The Details:

  • Scholarship Discontinuation: The ban on DEI initiatives led to the cessation of scholarships intended to assist underrepresented groups, such as minorities and LGBTQ individuals, in accessing higher education.

  • Impact on Black History Month: Universities across Texas experienced a notable weakening of their Black History Month events and programs due to restrictions imposed by the ban on DEI efforts.

  • Diminished LGBTQ Support: As a result of the ban, support programs and resources for LGBTQ students have seen reductions, limiting their access to essential services and support networks on campus.

  • Budgetary Implementation: The prohibition on DEI initiatives was enforced through a budget provision, sparking debate and condemnation from advocates who argue that it impedes efforts to foster diversity and inclusivity in academia.

Why is this relevant: This article underscores the significance of legislative actions in shaping diversity and inclusion policies within educational institutions. It highlights the direct impact of Texas' ban on DEI efforts, revealing how such measures can disrupt support systems for marginalized groups and hinder progress toward creating equitable learning environments.

The article's relevance lies in its illumination of the ongoing struggle to balance legislative mandates with the imperative to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education, ultimately emphasizing the need for continued advocacy and action to address systemic inequalities.

MGMT PlaybookPractical management insights straight to your inbox every Wednesday.

A few other developments…👇🏾

Until later,

This newsletter is co-curated by Deron Dalton.

P.S If you aren’t already subscribed to DEI in 5 on YouTube, what are you waiting for? 🙃

P.S.S. Btw, if you’re interested in starting your own newsletter, or if you’re not loving your current newsletter platform 🥴, I highly recommend Beehiiv, it’s been a breeze to use and they provide a few more monetization opportunities than other platforms I’ve come across.